Review of European Administrative Law (REALaw)

2024 / 3-4 (december) 1

Luca De Lucia
Editorial online pdf

Article

L. F. D. Honée - PhD candidate, Leiden Law School, the Netherlands, A. Drahmann - Associate Professor, Leiden Law School, the Netherlands
OPEN ACCESS
The Right to Access Public Information: A Legal Comparison between Sweden and the Netherlands online pdf
Guido Bellenghi - Maastricht University, Maastricht Centre for European Law (MCEL), Luca Knuth - Maastricht University and Kiel University, Maastricht Centre for European Law (MCEL) and Hermann Kantorowicz-Institute
EU Food Law and the Politics of the Internal Market: The Challenge of Cultivated Meat online pdf

Perspectives

Paola Chirulli - Professor of Administrative Law, Sapienza University of Rome
Towards a uniform system of administrative review before the Boards of Appeal: wishful thinking? The amended Article 58a of the Statute of the European Court of Justice online pdf
Sara Iglesias Sánchez - Profesora titular, Universidad Complutense de Madrid and member of the Instituto de Derecho Europeo y de Integración Regional (IDEIR)
Shared Jurisdiction of EU Courts over Preliminary Rulings: One procedure. Two Courts. One Interpretation? online pdf

Case Law Analysis

Albert Sanchez-Graells - Professor of Economic Law, University of Bristol Law School
Right to an Effective Remedy and to a Fair Trial: Is it Irrelevant whether a Procurement Review Body is Judicial in Character? Case C-303/22, CROSS Zlín online pdf
Rosario Federico - University of Bologna and Magistrate in training at the Tribunal of Bologna
State Aid control in search of legitimacy: still a (long?) way to go. Reflections on T-486/18 RENV – Danske Slagtermestre v European Commission online pdf

Book Review

Lisette Mustert - Assistant Professor of Administrative Law, Utrecht University
Research Handbook on Soft Law, M. Eliantonio, E. Korkea-aho, U. Mörth (eds.), Edward Elgar 2023, ISBN: 9781839101922, pp. 1-458. online pdf

Right to an Effective Remedy and to a Fair Trial: Is it Irrelevant whether a Procurement Review Body is Judicial in Character? Case C-303/22, CROSS Zlín

Albert Sanchez-Graells - Professor of Economic Law, University of Bristol Law School^*

Abstract

In this case comment, I reflect on the position taken by the Court of Justice of the European Union in CROSS Zlín that, for the purposes of suspending the effectiveness of contract award decisions and preventing the conclusion of public contracts, it is irrelevant whether a procurement review body is judicial in character or not. I reiterate the call for a review of the Remedies Directive.

Wachtwoord vergeten?

Abonneren op dit tijdschrift

Om toegang te krijgen tot het gehele artikel heeft u een abonnement nodig. Meer informatie over de abonnementsvormen en prijzen kunt u hier vinden.

Abonneren op dit tijdschrift

Indien u een los artikel wilt bestellen, stuur een e-mail naar info@uitgeverijparis.nl